xs
xsm
sm
md
lg

What threat would a giant Mekong dam pose?

เผยแพร่:   โดย: MGR Online

<bR><FONT color=#000033>This picture taken on March 25, 2010 shows Cambodian workers transporting sand along the Mekong river in Kandal province, north of Phnom Penh. A severe drought in Southeast Asia and southern China has caused the Mekong River to drop to a 50-year low, affecting farmers, fishermen living along it. Plans for the first dam across the lower Mekong River are putting Laos on a collision course with its neighbours and environmentalists who fear livelihoods, fish species and farmland could be destroyed, potentially sparking a food crisis. AFP PHOTO/Tang Chhin Sothy [FILE] </b>

By Martin Petty
BANGKOK, April 19 (Reuters) - Officials from Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam met on Tuesday to debate a plan to build a huge dam across the Mekong River, a project experts warn could trigger a food security crisis in the region.

The proposed $3.5 billion, 810-metre (2,600-ft) Xayaburi dam in northern Laos is being touted as a major step for green energy, but ecologists and environmentalists believe millions of livelihoods and regional stability are at stake if the dam goes ahead.

WHAT ARE THE EXPERTS SAYING?

They warn dozens of migratory fish species will become extinct if the dam is built. Fish stocks will dwindle, affecting fishermen and local people who live off Southeast Asia's biggest waterway.

The dam could prevent the movement of fertile silt needed to replenish agricultural land. Parts of the Mekong river in Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia could be turned into virtual reservoirs and crops vital to domestic consumption and exports, such as rice, could be starved of nutrients.

They also say the proposed fish ladder -- which allows fish to move through the dams -- was poorly designed and is likely to fail. A decline in stocks would have an impact on the human protein intake and revenues for farmers and fishermen would be significantly reduced, forcing many to relocate.

A study by the Mekong River Commission (MRC), an inter-government agency set up to coordinate dam projects, says the Xayaburi dam could lose 60 percent of its capacity within 30 years due to sedimentation.

SO WHY IS LAOS SO EAGER WANT TO GO AHEAD?

Laos's ambitious Communist government wants to shed its status as one of the world's poorest countries within the next decade and is aggressively pursuing hydropower as a means to generate income and raise its international profile. The sparsely populated nation has 10 projects so far and 60 more in the pipeline.

It has agreed deals to generate power for Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam and relishes its newfound reputation as the "battery of Southeast Asia". By producing hydroelectric power, Laos sees itself as increasing its political clout and reducing its dependence on its neighbours.

Laos insists green energy is the way forward and has ignored the chorus of criticism. It is "excited" about Xayaburi and stands by its view that environmental and human impacts will be minimal.

DID LAOS CARRY OUT A PROPER ASSESSMENT OF THE RISKS?

Apparently not. The Environmental Impact Assessment by the Lao government was seen as inadequate and incomplete. Experts said the EIA lacked credibility and was fraught with contradictions. Some called it "irresponsible" for failing to address risks for fisheries and livelihoods of local people.

U.S. environmental group International Rivers said the Lao government had shown "complete disregard" for the MRC's detailed findings and called for the dam to be halted. U.S. Senator Jim Webb warned of regional instability if there was no coordinated approach in planning the dam.
<bR><FONT color=#000033>A Cambodian fishing woman rows her boat along the Mekong river in Phnom Penh on April 5, 2010. A severe drought in Southeast Asia and southern China has caused the Mekong River to drop to a 50-year low, affecting farmers, fishermen living along it. Plans for the first dam across the lower Mekong River are putting Laos on a collision course with its neighbours and environmentalists who fear livelihoods, fish species and farmland could be destroyed, potentially sparking a food crisis. AFP PHOTO/Tang Chhin Sothy [FILE] </b>
WHAT ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES IN THE MEKONG BASIN?

Thailand will benefit greatly from the dam but has said very little about it. Thai construction firm CH Karnchang is a partner in the project and Thailand is buying most of the dam's power. However, Thais living downstream of the dam might not be so happy.

Cambodia and Vietnam are pushing for a delay to ensure a comprehensive, collaborative assessment of risks can be conducted.

Vietnam, Laos's most influential ally, seems to be most upset by its neighbour's determination to press ahead. Vietnam is a major driver of Laos's fledgling $6 billion economy and holds huge sway with its smaller socialist ally, exerting what seems like a "big brother" influence on Laos, providing political, social and economic support to a country where technocrats are few and far between.

Vietnam very rarely criticises its neighbour but officials have spoken out about the dam in recent weeks and negative stories have appeared in the state-controlled media. This is very unusual and suggests quiet diplomacy may have failed.

IS LAOS LIKELY TO DELAY CONSTRUCTION?

No one seems to know. The standoff has baffled even the most clued-in experts, who are unsure exactly why Laos -- a country that rarely creates conflicts -- is defying its neighbours, especially, Vietnam.

International pressure, threats or incentives could encourage Laos to delay the project if it feels it might benefit.

However, it seems determined to move ahead and photographs published in a newspaper appear to show construction of an access road is already under way, even though the consultation process with its neighbours, as required by a 1995 MRC treaty, has not yet been completed.
(Editing by Alex Richardson)
กำลังโหลดความคิดเห็น